← todas las casas de cambio

LINK USDT

tipo de tasa
Cotizaciones a tasa de mercado (pueden cambiar antes de ejecutarse).
root@notkyc:~$ tasas en caché para todos · ttl 60s · 0s
# Casa de cambio Puntuación Historial sin KYC? Tasa Recibes (1 LINK) Límites (LINK)
1 FixedFloat MEJOR D priv 45trust 67
0/1 KYC-free
1 LINK = 7.853 USDT 7.853 USDT min 1.267 · max 862.886 intercambiar en notkyc intercambiar en FixedFloat →
2 OctoSwap A priv 87trust 70
// no on-platform swaps yet
1 LINK = 7.796489 USDT 7.796489 USDT min 886.861776 · max 152033.447358 intercambiar en notkyc intercambiar en OctoSwap →
3 XMRS C priv 61trust 71
6/6 KYC-free
1 LINK = 7.7351 USDT 7.7351 USDT min 12.6694 · max 126694.5394 intercambiar en notkyc intercambiar en XMRS →
4 SideShift C priv 48trust 78 1 LINK = 7.68551565 USDT 7.68551565 USDT min 3.55193462 · max 3810.70753522 intercambiar en SideShift →
5 StealthEX C priv 49trust 79
5/5 KYC-free
1 LINK = 2.314047 USDT 2.314047 USDT min 1.5251117 intercambiar en notkyc intercambiar en StealthEX →
FixedFloat MEJOR D
Tasa1 LINK = 7.853 USDT
Recibes7.853 USDT
Límitesmin 1.267 · max 862.886 LINK
Tasa1 LINK = 7.796489 USDT
Recibes7.796489 USDT
Límitesmin 886.861776 · max 152033.447358 LINK
Tasa1 LINK = 7.7351 USDT
Recibes7.7351 USDT
Límitesmin 12.6694 · max 126694.5394 LINK
Tasa1 LINK = 7.68551565 USDT
Recibes7.68551565 USDT
Límitesmin 3.55193462 · max 3810.70753522 LINK
Tasa1 LINK = 2.314047 USDT
Recibes2.314047 USDT
Límitesmin 1.5251117 LINK

Chainlink tends to swing harder than the broader market during oracle narrative cycles and broader risk-off moves. Rotating LINK into USDT lets you lock in gains or cap drawdowns without leaving the crypto rails or triggering a KYC checkpoint on a centralized venue. Aggregating quotes across 17 no-KYC swap services exposes the real spread on this pair, which matters because LINK liquidity fragments across ERC20 pools and several wrapped representations.

// sobre este par

LINK -> USDT: what makes this pair specific

LINK is natively an ERC20 token on Ethereum, with bridged versions on BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Base, Polygon, and Avalanche via CCIP. USDT exists across more networks than almost any other asset - ERC20, TRC20, BEP20, Arbitrum, Polygon, Solana, and others - and the network you pick on the receive side dominates your total cost more than the headline rate does. Sending LINK from Ethereum mainnet and receiving USDT on TRC20 is a common pattern: you pay one ERC20 gas fee on deposit, then hold a stablecoin you can move onward for fractions of a cent.

Liquidity for LINK/USDT is deep on most aggregated routes, so slippage on amounts under ~50k USD is usually negligible. Above that, quotes start to diverge meaningfully between providers.

Choosing a route

  • Match the LINK network you actually hold - sending ERC20 LINK to an address expecting Arbitrum LINK is an unrecoverable mistake on most no-KYC services.
  • Check min and max bounds before signing - LINK swaps often have higher floors than majors because providers hedge inventory.
  • Prefer fixed-rate quotes if LINK is moving fast; float rates can drift 1-3 percent during a 20-minute Ethereum confirmation window.
  • Read the refund policy - if you miss the rate-lock window or send an off-range amount, some services refund to a user-supplied address, others require contact.

Practical tips: size your swap so the network fee is under 0.5 percent of notional; if you are exiting into USDT to wait out volatility, TRC20 or an L2 keeps onward movement cheap; never reuse a quoted deposit address from a previous swap - they expire and funds sent late can be processed at a worse rate or held pending manual review.

// preguntas
Which USDT network should I receive on when swapping from LINK?
If you plan to hold or move USDT onward to another exchange or wallet, TRC20 has the lowest fees and broad support. If you intend to use USDT in DeFi, match the chain of the protocol you are targeting - Arbitrum or Base USDT for L2 DeFi, ERC20 for mainnet, Solana USDT for Solana-based venues. The network choice affects withdrawal costs more than the LINK->USDT rate itself.
Is it cheaper to swap LINK on Ethereum mainnet or on an L2?
If your LINK is already on Arbitrum or Base, swapping there avoids mainnet gas, typically saving 5-20 USD per transaction. However, fewer no-KYC aggregator routes support L2 LINK as a source asset, so liquidity can be thinner and rates slightly worse. Compare the all-in output, not just gas - sometimes paying mainnet gas wins on larger sizes.
Should I use a fixed or floating rate for this pair?
Fixed rate locks the quote at signing and protects you if LINK drops during the Ethereum confirmation window, which can take 2-15 minutes. Floating rate gives a slightly better headline number but recalculates on arrival. For exiting volatility specifically - which is the whole point of going to USDT - fixed is usually the rational choice.
Are there minimum amounts for LINK -> USDT swaps?
Most no-KYC services set minimums between 5 and 20 LINK to ensure the swap covers their hedging and network costs. Maximums vary widely - some cap at around 10k LINK per transaction, others allow larger with manual review. The aggregator surface shows live min/max per route, so you can filter before committing.
Can a no-KYC swap freeze my funds during a LINK -> USDT trade?
Pure non-custodial routes that swap atomically generally cannot freeze funds, but most aggregated services route through a provider that briefly custodies during the swap. Risk increases if your LINK was previously associated with flagged addresses - some providers run on-chain risk scoring and may pause for 'compliance review' even without formal KYC. Use clean inputs and split very large swaps.
Why do quotes for LINK -> USDT vary so much between providers?
Providers source liquidity from different venues - some route through Uniswap v3 LINK/USDT or LINK/ETH pools, others through centralized market makers, others net trades internally. Spread, hedging cost, and inventory position all factor in. On a volatile day for LINK, the gap between best and worst quote can exceed 1.5 percent, which is why live comparison matters more than picking a default service.
// relacionados