TON → APT

sort by

rate type

Floating Fixed

Market-rate quotes (may change before execution).

root@notkyc:~$ rates cached for everyone · ttl 60s · 0s

#	Exchange	Score	No-KYC record?	Rate	You receive (1 TON)	Limits (TON)
1	SideShift BEST	C priv 48trust 78	—	1 TON = 2.67985277 APT	2.67985277 APT	min 1.76278009 · max 4354.28295982		swap on SideShift →
2	StealthEX	C priv 49trust 79	5/5 KYC-free	1 TON = 2.6492151 APT	2.6492151 APT	min 0.1050001	swap on notkyc	swap on StealthEX →

SideShift BEST C

Rate1 TON = 2.67985277 APT

You receive2.67985277 APT

Limitsmin 1.76278009 · max 4354.28295982 TON

swap on SideShift →

StealthEX C

Rate1 TON = 2.6492151 APT

You receive2.6492151 APT

Limitsmin 0.1050001 TON

swap on notkyc swap on StealthEX →

Swapping Toncoin to Aptos crosses two non-EVM ecosystems with very different design philosophies: TON's sharded workchains built around the Telegram user base, and Aptos' Move-based parallel execution layer descended from Diem. There is no native bridge between them, so an aggregated swap is usually faster and cheaper than manual bridging through a stablecoin hop. This page compares live no-KYC rates so you can move TON liquidity into the APT ecosystem without account signups or address whitelisting.

// about this pair

Why TON -> APT is a non-trivial pair

TON and Aptos use incompatible address formats, signature schemes (Ed25519 in both, but different key derivation), and virtual machines (TVM vs Move). You cannot send TON to an Aptos address or vice versa - the funds will not appear and recovery depends on the swap provider's policy. Both chains settle quickly: TON finalizes in roughly 5 seconds, Aptos in sub-second with ~1-2 second practical confirmation. Network fees on both sides are typically under $0.05, so the dominant cost is the spread between providers.

Liquidity for this pair is thinner than TON -> USDT or APT -> USDT routes. Most aggregators internally route through a stablecoin or BTC leg, which means the quoted rate already includes two market-maker spreads. Expect 0.5-1.5% total deviation from the implied CEX mid-price on amounts under $10k.

What to check before locking a quote

Network selection: TON has only one mainnet, but confirm the deposit memo/comment field is handled correctly - some providers require it, others reject deposits that include one.
APT destination: verify the receiving address starts with '0x' and is 64 hex characters. Aptos addresses can be displayed with or without leading zeros - use the full form.
Rate type: floating rates track the market and usually give better fills; fixed rates lock the quote but add a 0.5-1% premium for the provider's hedging risk.
Refund address: always provide one. If the APT side liquidity gaps mid-swap, you want TON returned, not stuck in 'compliance review'.
Min/max: TON minimums are often set around 5-10 TON; APT-side maxes can be capped by hot-wallet float.

Practical tip: avoid swapping during Telegram-driven TON volume spikes (token launches, Notcoin-style events) - spreads widen sharply. For amounts above $5k, split into two transactions and compare quotes between them; provider rates refresh every 30-60 seconds.

// FAQ

Can I send TON directly to an Aptos wallet?

No. TON and Aptos are entirely separate chains with incompatible address formats and no native bridge. Sending TON to an APT address (or APT to a TON address) will result in lost funds with no on-chain recovery path. A swap service is required to convert between them, which is why aggregating no-KYC providers makes sense for this pair.

Does my TON deposit need a memo or comment?

It depends on the provider. Some no-KYC services use a single deposit address shared across users and require a comment field to attribute your transaction; others generate a unique address per swap and reject deposits with comments. Always copy both fields exactly as shown in the order page, and never reuse a deposit address from a previous swap.

How long does a TON -> APT swap take end to end?

Both chains are fast: TON confirms in about 5 seconds, Aptos in 1-2 seconds. The bottleneck is the provider's internal routing, which often hops through USDT or BTC. Realistic end-to-end time is 2-10 minutes for floating-rate swaps, longer if the provider batches withdrawals or runs manual checks on larger amounts.

Why are TON -> APT rates worse than going through USDT manually?

They often are not, once you account for two transaction fees, two spreads, and the time-risk of holding USDT between legs. Aggregated direct quotes bundle the routing internally and compete on the final number. For amounts under ~$2k the convenience usually wins; above that, manually splitting via USDT on TON -> USDT on Aptos can save 0.2-0.5%.

Is no-KYC swapping safe for this pair?

The cryptographic part is safe - you keep custody until the deposit confirms, and the swap is atomic from your perspective. The risks are provider-side: address blacklisting, 'enhanced verification' demands mid-swap, or stuck transactions. Mitigate by setting a refund address, starting with a small test amount on first use of any provider, and preferring floating rates to avoid timeout disputes.

Which wallets handle the receiving APT side cleanly?

Petra, Pontem, and Martian are the standard Aptos wallets and all display incoming swaps reliably. Make sure the wallet is initialized on-chain (Aptos requires an account resource to exist) before sending large amounts - some providers will fail the withdrawal if the destination has never been funded. Sending 0.1 APT first to activate the account avoids this.

// related