Godex vs StealthEX
| Godex | StealthEX | |
|---|---|---|
| Trust score | D | C |
| Privacy | 36 | 49 |
| Trust | 64 | 79 |
| Type | exchange | exchange |
| Verified | — | — |
| Reviews | 0 | 0 |
Godex
- ✓ No registration needed
- ✓ Accepts Monero
- ✓ Public policies
- ✓ Legally registered
- ✓ Live rates / API
- ✗ Transaction monitoring
- ✗ May freeze funds on AML
- ✗ KYC required for AML refund
- ✗ KYC depends on partner
- ✗ Shotgun KYC
StealthEX
- ✓ No registration needed
- ✓ No email required
- ✓ Accepts Monero
- ✓ Non-custodial
- ✓ Public policies
- ✗ Transaction monitoring
- ✗ KYC required for AML refund
- ✗ Shotgun KYC
- ✗ May freeze / suspend
Godex vs StealthEX: which fits your use case?
Both Godex and StealthEX launched in 2018, skip KYC, and use a hybrid rate model with case-by-case refund handling. They land at the same overall score (B), but the core architectural difference matters: Godex operates as a custodial aggregator, while StealthEX is non-custodial and routes orders to partner liquidity providers without holding user funds beyond the swap window.
- Pick Godex if you want a single aggregated quote across 930+ assets, value the 14-day data deletion policy, and don't mind the custodial-aggregator model for the duration of the swap.
- Pick StealthEX if you prefer a non-custodial flow, need access to a wider catalogue (2000+ assets), or want minimal exposure to a single operator holding funds.
On rates, neither is universally cheaper; hybrid pricing means quotes depend on the pair, route, and whether you choose fixed or floating. Refund policies are similar on paper, but non-custodial routing on StealthEX can simplify recovery when a partner provider is involved.
Recommendation: compare live quotes for your exact pair on both before committing. For privacy-maximalist swaps, StealthEX's non-custodial model has a slight edge; for users who prefer an aggregator UX with a longer asset history, Godex remains a solid pick.