SideShift vs Exolix
_ no-KYC exchange comparison · trust, privacy, custody
| SideShift | Exolix | |
|---|---|---|
| Trust score | C | C |
| Privacy | 48 | 49 |
| Trust | 78 | 80 |
| Type | exchange | exchange |
| Verified | — | — |
| Reviews | 0 | 0 |
// pros & cons
SideShift
- ✓ No registration needed
- ✓ No email required
- ✓ Accepts Monero
- ✓ Non-custodial
- ✓ Good customer support
- ✗ Transaction monitoring
- ✗ Shotgun KYC
- ✗ Data sharing
- ✗ May freeze / suspend
Exolix
- ✓ No registration needed
- ✓ No email required
- ✓ Accepts Monero
- ✓ Non-custodial
- ✓ Good customer support
- ✗ Transaction monitoring
- ✗ May freeze funds on AML
- ✗ KYC required for AML refund
- ✗ Shotgun KYC
- ✗ May freeze / suspend
// verdict
SideShift vs Exolix: which to pick
Both are no-KYC swap services launched in 2018, both score B in our rubric, and both operate as custodial routers that hold funds only during the swap window. The practical differences come down to scope and routing philosophy.
- Asset coverage: Exolix advertises 2600+ assets via an aggregator model pulling from multiple liquidity providers. SideShift lists 200+ coins across many networks, with a more curated set.
- Rates: Both offer hybrid fixed and floating quotes. Exolix's aggregator can surface tighter spreads on long-tail pairs; SideShift is often competitive on majors like BTC, ETH and SOL.
- Custody: Funds are held temporarily in both cases. Neither is non-custodial in the strict sense, despite marketing language.
- Refunds: Handled case-by-case on both sides, which means a refund address at quote time is essential.
Pick SideShift if you want a clean interface for mainstream coins and value its longer public track record in the privacy-swap niche. Pick Exolix if you need an unusual token or want to compare provider quotes in one place. For high-value swaps, request a fixed-rate quote on both and route through whichever returns the better net amount after network fees.
// FAQ
Is SideShift or Exolix safer?
Both have operated since 2018 without major public incidents and both are custodial during the swap window. Risk profile is similar. Always set a refund address, avoid leaving funds idle on either platform, and prefer fixed-rate quotes for large amounts to limit exposure.
Which has better rates?
It depends on the pair. Exolix aggregates multiple providers so it often wins on niche or low-liquidity tokens. SideShift is frequently competitive on BTC, ETH and SOL pairs. The only reliable method is to request a live quote from both for your specific amount.
Do either require KYC?
Neither requires registration or KYC for standard swaps. However, both reserve the right to request verification if a transaction is flagged by their compliance or AML screening, typically when funds are linked to sanctioned or high-risk sources.
What happens if a swap fails?
Both handle refunds on a case-by-case basis, so providing a valid refund address when creating the order is critical. Without it, recovering funds from a failed or underpaid transaction becomes slower and may require manual support contact.
// related