Godex vs Swapzone
| Godex | Swapzone | |
|---|---|---|
| Trust score | D | D |
| Privacy | 36 | 40 |
| Trust | 64 | 78 |
| Type | exchange | aggregator |
| Verified | — | — |
| Reviews | 0 | 0 |
Godex
- ✓ No registration needed
- ✓ Accepts Monero
- ✓ Public policies
- ✓ Legally registered
- ✓ Live rates / API
- ✗ Transaction monitoring
- ✗ May freeze funds on AML
- ✗ KYC required for AML refund
- ✗ KYC depends on partner
- ✗ Shotgun KYC
Swapzone
- ✓ No registration needed
- ✓ No email required
- ✓ No JavaScript needed
- ✓ Accepts Monero
- ✓ Non-custodial
- ✗ KYC depends on partner
- ✗ Shotgun KYC
- ✗ KYC required for AML refund
- ✗ Transaction monitoring
- ✗ Data sharing
Godex vs Swapzone: which to choose
Both services launched in 2018 and operate without KYC for most swap sizes, but they solve different problems. Godex is a direct exchange with a custodial-aggregator model: it quotes you a rate, takes your deposit, and routes liquidity behind the scenes. Swapzone is a pure aggregator that lists quotes from 18+ partner exchanges and forwards your trade to the chosen provider, so custody and execution actually sit with that partner rather than Swapzone itself.
- Pick Godex if you want a single counterparty, a consistent flow, support for 930+ coins, and the option of fixed rates locked at quote time. Refunds are handled case-by-case directly by Godex.
- Pick Swapzone if you want to compare live rates across many providers, keep funds off a single platform until the last moment, and access a wider catalog (1600+ assets). Refunds depend on the underlying provider you selected.
Neither is strictly 'safer' - Swapzone reduces single-point custody risk but shifts trust to the chosen partner, while Godex keeps support and accountability in one place. Practical recommendation: use Swapzone to scan the market and Godex when you prefer a stable, direct counterparty with fixed-rate certainty.