PegasusSwap vs LetsExchange
| PegasusSwap | LetsExchange | |
|---|---|---|
| Trust score | A+ | D |
| Privacy | 95 | 42 |
| Trust | 94 | 60 |
| Type | exchange | exchange |
| Verified | — | — |
| Reviews | 0 | 0 |
PegasusSwap
- ✓ Guaranteed no-KYC
- ✓ No KYC after AML flag
- ✓ Refunds without KYC on AML flag
- ✓ No registration needed
- ✓ Tor / onion service
- ✗ Transaction monitoring
LetsExchange
- ✓ No registration needed
- ✓ No email required
- ✓ Tor / onion service
- ✓ Accepts Monero
- ✓ Public policies
- ✗ Transaction monitoring
- ✗ May freeze funds on AML
- ✗ KYC required for AML refund
- ✗ KYC depends on partner
- ✗ Shotgun KYC
PegasusSwap vs LetsExchange: which aggregator fits your swap?
Both platforms operate as custodial aggregators with no mandatory KYC, offer hybrid rate models (fixed or floating), and handle refunds on a case-by-case basis. The practical differences come down to coverage, track record, and interface preference rather than custody model.
- PegasusSwap has been running since 2020, advertises 1000+ assets, and positions itself around speed and simplicity. A reasonable pick if you want a lean swap flow for mainstream pairs.
- LetsExchange launched in 2021 and emphasizes much broader coverage, claiming 5,980+ assets across 300+ networks with cross-chain bridging and 24/7 support. Better suited if you swap long-tail tokens or move between less common chains.
On custody risk both are equivalent: you trust the aggregator (and its upstream liquidity providers) during the swap window. Compliance teams on either side can freeze a transaction flagged by AML screening, and refunds usually require KYC on the originating funds.
Practical recommendation: for common BTC, ETH, SOL, or stablecoin pairs, quote both and pick the better live rate. For exotic tokens or unusual networks, LetsExchange typically has wider reach. Always test with a small amount first.