PegasusSwap vs Swapzone
| PegasusSwap | Swapzone | |
|---|---|---|
| Trust score | A+ | D |
| Privacy | 95 | 40 |
| Trust | 94 | 78 |
| Type | exchange | aggregator |
| Verified | — | — |
| Reviews | 0 | 0 |
PegasusSwap
- ✓ Guaranteed no-KYC
- ✓ No KYC after AML flag
- ✓ Refunds without KYC on AML flag
- ✓ No registration needed
- ✓ Tor / onion service
- ✗ Transaction monitoring
Swapzone
- ✓ No registration needed
- ✓ No email required
- ✓ No JavaScript needed
- ✓ Accepts Monero
- ✓ Non-custodial
- ✗ KYC depends on partner
- ✗ Shotgun KYC
- ✗ KYC required for AML refund
- ✗ Transaction monitoring
- ✗ Data sharing
PegasusSwap vs Swapzone: which to pick
Both platforms skip KYC for standard swaps and offer hybrid rate models (fixed or floating), but they operate on different architectures. Swapzone is an aggregator: it queries 18+ partner exchanges and routes your trade to the chosen provider, so funds move through that partner rather than Swapzone itself. PegasusSwap behaves more like a custodial-style aggregator, taking your deposit and returning the output asset.
- Custody: Swapzone is non-custodial by design (trade settles with the partner); PegasusSwap touches funds during the swap.
- Track record: Swapzone has been live since 2018, PegasusSwap since 2020.
- Coverage: Swapzone advertises 1600+ assets across partners; PegasusSwap lists 1000+.
- Refunds: both handle disputes case-by-case, but with Swapzone the dispute path runs through the underlying provider.
Pick Swapzone if you want to compare live quotes across multiple providers and minimize custody exposure. Pick PegasusSwap if you prefer a single-interface flow without choosing a partner each time. For larger trades, Swapzone's transparency on the executing provider is generally the safer default; for quick small swaps, either works.