StealthEX vs Swapzone
| StealthEX | Swapzone | |
|---|---|---|
| Trust score | C | D |
| Privacy | 49 | 40 |
| Trust | 79 | 78 |
| Type | exchange | aggregator |
| Verified | — | — |
| Reviews | 0 | 0 |
StealthEX
- ✓ No registration needed
- ✓ No email required
- ✓ Accepts Monero
- ✓ Non-custodial
- ✓ Public policies
- ✗ Transaction monitoring
- ✗ KYC required for AML refund
- ✗ Shotgun KYC
- ✗ May freeze / suspend
Swapzone
- ✓ No registration needed
- ✓ No email required
- ✓ No JavaScript needed
- ✓ Accepts Monero
- ✓ Non-custodial
- ✗ KYC depends on partner
- ✗ Shotgun KYC
- ✗ KYC required for AML refund
- ✗ Transaction monitoring
- ✗ Data sharing
StealthEX vs Swapzone: which to pick
Both services launched in 2018, run non-custodial flows, and offer hybrid rates (fixed or floating) with case-by-case refund handling. The core difference is structural: StealthEX is a direct exchange that quotes its own rates across 2000+ assets, while Swapzone is an aggregator that pulls live quotes from 18+ partner exchanges and routes the swap to the chosen provider.
- Pick StealthEX if you prefer a single, consistent interface, want privacy-focused defaults (no registration, automatic data deletion), and value a predictable counterparty for every swap.
- Pick Swapzone if you want to compare rates side by side before committing, optimize for best price or fastest provider on a given pair, or need exposure to multiple liquidity sources from one screen.
Neither holds your funds, and neither requires KYC for standard swaps, though the downstream provider on Swapzone may flag transactions independently. Track records are comparable, and refund outcomes depend on the routing partner in both cases.
Practical recommendation: use Swapzone first to scan the market for your pair, then either confirm through its best-rated route or swap directly on StealthEX if its quote is competitive. Always compare live quotes before sending funds; advertised ranges shift constantly.